.
A week or so ago I had in my head the number of seismic events of various sizes under the sea to the east of Honshu
- along with a few on the west side of the island, and south of the entire area.
The main body of the now several hundred events of 4.5 or greater magnitude are all concentrated in a "surface" area on our planet not greater than five degrees north to south, five degrees west to east.
Among those events are dozens of earthquakes of 6.0 or greater in magnitude, including a few 7.0 and above
- all *aftershocks* of the 9.0 - in a series which "began" with a 7.2
Most of those events 6.0 and above are felt on the island, and some of them have even triggered tsunami alerts, though no new damaging waves have hit the island since March 11.
While we cannot begin to imagine what these days must be like for the Japanese people, what we cannot see are the smaller - less than 4.5 - events, which surely must now number in the high thousands since just before noon on March 9, Japanese local time.
The biggest natural differences I can see are that the Japan Trench is much deeper, it is relatively short, and a hundred mile length of reclaimed Honshu shoreline, mostly devoted to agriculture, was barely above sea level, and although tsumani defenses were constructed decades ago, they were not high enough to withstand a wave of the size generated just a few miles offshore on the afternoon of March 11.
Neither the Chilean coast nor the area affected by the Sumatra quake of 2004 had a nuclear plant with backup power generating and water cooling facilities installed at a very low elevation vulnerable to a wave as high as came onshore at Fukushima.
Somewhere recently I remember at least intending to say (may be I did not since I cannot find reference to it) something to the effect of, "Whether you believe the Japanese earthquake was a natural event or not ..."
This last winter has been a "haze" of weeks devoted to work with not much but sleep between shifts except for "glimpses" of what is happening in our world.
Information comes to me from many sources now, much of it anything but "mainstream" and when it does have "spin" I pretty much expect it, knowing the particular source as well as I do.
Some of the information is "wacky" and some is not, yet it comes from people who are looking at what is NOT in the "noose" and aware of things going on beyond "what we are expected to believe" - all of it enhancing my overall view which is no longer altogether "through the veil" but sometimes clearly on the other side of the veil most of us have had for so long to try to push aside to understand what we are hearing and seeing.
Still, I try to be cautious not to venture too far into "theories" - taking a "wait and see" approach instead.
Even so, I am not beyond offering a bit of my developing "unified theory" as I have done more than once.
I have said I do not believe man is yet capable of modifying weather and / or producing earthquakes, BUT ...
The technology *exists* to do both, AND it is being used - at least experimented with - and as in any "early stage of discovery" mistakes CAN and WILL BE (I am sure already have been) MADE.
Such technology has other uses, as well, and when the initial 7.2 hit Japan I was already aware of the solar activity which "threatened" earth's magnetosphere, a March 9 solar flare that was due to affect our planet Friday and Saturday, March 11 and 12.
Then, just after the 9.0 struck, between "naps" I was informed that HAARP had "burst" at almost the same time as the massive earthquake occurred.
That is what prompted me to want to say something to the effect of, "Whether you believe the Japanese earthquake was a natural event or not, efforts to protect our magnetosphere from Wednesday's solar activity may have inadvertently produced the Japanese earthquake" ... which produced the destructive tsunami, which destroyed the backup generators required to maintain cooling in the Fukushima reactors ...
... and if any of that IS true, it may well have been "inadvertent" - a "byproduct" of "saving our planet" - saving our electrical grid or saving our electronics, communication and transportation infrastructure, etc.
OR, I come back to that "economic warfare" that continues to be "waged" in various ways around our planet - provoked "grass roots" democratic uprisings possibly intended to "reconsolidate" control of petroleum and other natural resources, etc.
While "radiation concerns" panic North Americans, adding to PharmaCo *offshore* profits for 2011, and recent nuclear fervor is cooling, General Electric continues to bring "good things" even to the Oval Office.
Japanese oil consumption will decline as the Japanese economy, which has been in decline for decades, reels from the knockout blow from which it may never fully recover.
U. S. auto production is also clobbered by the destruction in Japan, in line with *zero industrial growth* imposed by the 1974 conference.
What appears to be "unrelated" and "natural" also appears to be in line with that decades old declared "global agenda" to which people are slowly awakening, yet most Americans remain fast asleep, like the air traffic controller in the tower, while planes continue to land, and a Chinese submarine launches a missile from the channel 35 miles "off the coast of Los Angeles" in broad daylight.
The most sobering part of my day right now is looking at the 175-foot tower venting steam over the power plant at the ship yard three blocks from where I work five days a week, knowing full well that if there are *nuclear targets* on the West Coast of the United States, I am looking at (standing at) *ground zero* for one of them, and I keep asking myself whether I can contemplate that for four more years.
When I saw the HAARP signal images coinciding with the then 8.9 event off Honshu, I knew that action could have been either "accidental" or *intentional* and frankly, it gave me such a sinking feeling to think either scenario could be true, yet knowing that is "where we are" today, technologically speaking, I have to continue to educate my own self and at the same time not appear to be going "off the deep end" in terms of communicating with everyone, with anyone
... but now the kicker is that apparently the images from Gakona were taken down from public view for a few days, and then when "outcry" developed, they were put back up on the site.
Of course the "problem" for me is that such "information" is still *second hand* - not personally verifiable by me - and there is only so much I can do - yet if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck ... you know I do not believe in coincidence.
I see a future being "fashioned" for us all, and I do not like it.
We are too used to seeing images of destruction - Christchurch recently: "It can happen anywhere, any time, and to such nice people." - and there are worse images to come, I believe, and they are not so far off in time that we will miss seeing them, unless our "electronic umbrella" is blown away by the solar wind.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment